Whereas the war is rifing between Israël and Palestine, the french diplomatie chief Bernard Kouchner went today in Jerusalem in order to support the effort of Israël to establish peace.
The conflict is not new and it began until the creation of the state of Palestine in 1948 ...
A little bit of history ...
At the beggining, the Palestine was a state create in the aim of receive the refugees of the Shoa.
But, just after its creation it was seperate in two blocks, the Jewish communitie and the Arabic communitie. The civil war explode ... From the begining of the war, Israël was always supported by France and England. In spite of many armistice signed along the following years, the war continu between Israelians and Palestinians ...
Unfortunately, the state of Israël can rely upon Iran to make its life difficult. In fact, Iran wants to have the civil nuclear and the atomic bomb ! But Israël estimate that if Iran has the nuclear weapon it can be a threat against democratie and peace. So the prime minister of Israël Ehud Olmert, has demanded the support of France. In order to convince the governement of Téhéran, Bernard Kouchner demand to dial with them before any sanction. For that, France profits of its position this semester at the head of the European union.
But, I think that this is a bit ambiguous because the last year, the french group Areva, was looking for any kind of nuclear aliances with Iran in order to install some nuclear centers...
1 commentaire:
MARK: 10/20
- on time (2/2)
- heading + link (2/2)
- libellés (1/2)
- resumé para (3/7)
- comment para (2/7)
A good improvement on last week's effort. There are still a few things missing though, which would easily bring you up to a 14+.
First, be very careful about outright affirmations, especially when you are unsure of the details! All affirmations should be backed up with a source (or arguments and examples, if it is a statement of opinion). Your knowledge of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a little bit limited to launch into a full overview of the history. In situations like this, perhaps you can link to an overview of the history of the situation.
Certain important details are incorrect in your account:
1- Israel was created in 1948 for Shoa refugees, not Palestine!
2- Palestine is not a state for the moment; it is for this reason that it is called the Palestinian territories. In 1948, the Palestinian territories belonged to Britain (a colony).
3- France and the UK supported Israel in the beginning, but both countries' support has evolved over time...
4- Ehud Olmert is no longer the Israeli Prime Minister.
5- Iran argues that it only wants civil nuclear capacity; there is no suggestion from Iran that it wants the nuclear bomb.
Don't forget (when you are being side-tracked into discussing the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) that I want your resumé to actually sum up the article you have read! It would perhaps have been worth noting that Bernard Kouchner had a meeting with Mahmoud Abbas (the Palestinian leader) prior to his trip to Israel. This was not a one-sided peace promotion trip.
Finally, you start your comment paragraph with an interesting affirmation but this needs to be backed up with sources or arguments and examples! You seem to suggest that Areva's actions in Iran are in conflict with the French diplomatic position. But my sources suggest that, on the contrary, France would use Areva's presence in Iran to better oversee the development of nuclear capacity in Iran. See: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmafp/is_/ai_n16930565
Finally, be selective with your libellés. This is not a conflit social!
Enregistrer un commentaire