For the moment, it seems that the leaders are in disgreement on some aspects of this policy. In an official communiqué after the Communist Party's annual four day planning session, they just mentionned that the party was adopting a rural reform policy that would double the per capita disposable income of farmers by 2020. The details of this reform which could take into acount the land reform will be unveiled in two weeks, according to the head of the China research division for the Rural development Institute, or in March after the approval of the National People's Congress.
A village in Anhui Province, has already begun aplying this rural policy from 1978, for an experiment. The farmers of Xiaogang village began cultivating their own plots of land. Nowadays, some families have rented a total of 44 acres of land to a Shangai company. This is hoped to be a model for the accomplishments of the land reform policy.
This could be the biggest economic reform and mark a signifiant turn in Chinese economic policy. It would put an end to the collective ownership and state control that was instaured after the revoluition in 1949.
The causes could be the government worrying about the prospect of a deep recession in leading export market as well as the thousands of riots and protest in rural areas each year, which might be the biggest source of social unrest in China. If a market is developed for farmers, peasants could gain a new source of cash incom that could help to revitalize the economy by pushing peasants to product more. Some economists say that would lead to more efficient land use and allow much larger farms to establish. Moreover, this could help stabilize the inequalities between the cities and the rural zones. China is one of the starkest income gaps in the world.
But this is a delicate issue because private ownership of land is not allowed under the Constitution. Many parti traditionalists are strongly in favor of collective land ownership. They argue the China’s economy is still not robust enough to face this reform. Another point which is discussed is whether land contracts should be extended to 70 years wich would give farmers more security and presumably increase the value of their land-use rights.
We can notice that an big economic reform has already been done in the end of the 70°s, by Deng Xiaoping. The Communist party lost a part of his governmental control over citizens’ personal lives and many peasants received land leases. This led to the mixed economy and the « market socialism ». The actual government of China might want to continue an economic policy which has been beginning 30 years ago.
But the question could be : Is China going to become a capitalist country ? and if doesn’t how could it manage to be in th esame time socialist in politic and capitalist in economy ?
2 commentaires:
Idon't know if the libellés are good or not. I would rather thought of reform or state economic policy, or something like that . But I didn't know if I could put that because they are not in the libellész list
MARK: 16/20
- on time (2/2)
- heading & link (2/2)
- libellés (2/2)
- resumé para (5/7)
- comment para (5/7)
Another interesting choice of topic and extremely well researched! That said, I want you to try a few things in your coming blogposts:
- don't hesitate to reduce the length of your posts. Think of the reader (not just me!). He/she wants a quick intro to the topic, rather than the nitty-gritty details.
- consider updating your posts, as I suggested to Thibaud. This ensures that you keep your "actu" topics somewhere in the back of your mind throughout the year and that you update your knowledge (and in the process review what you have already learnt). Perhaps you could keep a list of the topics you have chosen in the back of your SES cahier as a reminder?
- don't forget to quote your sources when you refer to material not contained in the article. The last para of your resumé is a very interesting addition, but it clearly didn't come off the top of your head! You might have cited the following article for example: http://www.time.com/time/asia/2005/journey/revolution.html.
- try and make your comment para as personal as possible. I know you are perfectly capable of looking up what lots of other people think or have said about the issue, but what I would really like to see is that you, all by yourself, are able to make the link with your SES classes. What issues does this article raise that we have treated in theory in class? Try and think of this as an exercise in finding and adding examples to your class notes in preparation for the bac. If you are able (in your bac dissertation or synthèse) to draw on interesting examples from current affairs, you are certain to gain extra points...
- don't forget to re-read what you have written before publishing. You should do this with all your work! There are often a large number of typos or easily avoided English mistakes in your blogposts! (eg. "incom", "parti", "instaured" which is "established" in English, etc)
This looks like a lot of criticism; it is not. I cannot complain about your work! Consider these as suggestions for ways in which you could improve still further!
(NB: Mao Zedong proclaimed the People's Republic of China in 1949, but the Cultural Revolution only began in 1966.)
Enregistrer un commentaire