In France, charitable associations are worried about donations. The financial crisis might make donations less important. For the moment, the associations get as well money as before but they're worried about what is going to happen.
The financial crisis makes people less generous because they have to deal with their own problems. The charitable associations recognize that it is more difficult to find donators, now and that the donation's amount goes down.
Another problem to come is a rise of work because of the rise of unemployement. But solidarity can become stronger in difficult times.
Donation is a part of the purshasing power. With the stock market, it's an indicator of the economic wealth of a country.
Asssociations are a bit angry about the rescue plan, where a very important amount of money has been unfrosen for banks. As Mrs Bourgoin, France Générosité's responsible, says "We find billions to help banks more easily than to save little children".
The case evoked here seems to be without ending. More people would need help from charitable associations. These associations would need more donations. Because of the cris, people wouldn't have many purshasing power, so they wouldn't give much money for donations. Ect...
But, this situation might improve. Moreover, it' s just fears for the moment.
However, people needing charitable associations' help is a reality. Because, with the stock market, donation is an indicator of the economic wealth of a country, and that the government helped the stock market, it should help charitable associations too, or help citizens to find a better purshasing power.
Let me know what you think.
Which seems inredible is that even people who don't have a close link with the stock market suffer the consequences of its wealth. The "non marchand" services are dependent, in a certain way of the stock market weath. According to the analysis of K. Polanyi this is called "désencastrement de l'économie" (society is subordinate to the market). But, as nationalisations seem to become more and more used to face the financial crisis, we could come back, still according to the analysis of K. Polanyi, to "un encastrement de l'économie" like in the "Grande transformation" (after the crisis of 1929). State's intervention, which would lead social problems to a better situation. The charitable associations would be more helped and so able to help people in trouble...
vendredi 31 octobre 2008
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
1 commentaire:
MARK: 15/20
- on time (2/2)
- heading & link (1/2)
- libellés (2/2)
- resumé para (5/7)
- comment para (5/7)
Good work, as usual, although your chosen article was slightly lacking in journalistic content this week!
Comments:
- Re-read your work!
- The word for "donators" is donors in English
- The stock market and charities are not indicators of economic wealth, but indicators of the health of an economy. Careful!
- Donation is not a part of purchasing power; it is a function of purchasing power. When purchasing power varies, the amount of donations may vary too.
- The first half of your comment para is a second resumé, which finishes with a suggestion.
- The second half of your comment para shows a good link made with notions seen in class. However, you state the link and go no further.
Enregistrer un commentaire